• IMA sites
  • IMAJ services
  • IMA journals
  • Follow us
  • Alternate Text Alternate Text
עמוד בית
Mon, 29.04.24

Search results


April 2014
Tania Sezin MSc, Emily Avitan-Hersh MD, Margarita Indelman MSc, Roni Moscona MD, Edmond Sabo MD, Rina Katz MSc, Shimon Pollack MD and Reuven Bergman MD
 Background: Human amnion membrane (HAM) was suggested to be a superior antigenic substrate for immunoblotting in detecting autoantibodies of autoimmune bullous skin diseases.

Objectives: To determine the properties of HAM as an antigenic substrate for the detection of autoantibodies in pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid.

Methods: Immunomapping and tandem liquid chromatography mass spectrometry were used to delineate the antigenic structure of HAM in 25 pemphigus patients, 41 pemphigoid patients, and 36 controls. Immunoblotting and indirect immunofluorescence were used to study the diagnostic utility of HAM, and the results were compared to those of indirect immunofluorescence on monkey esophagus, immunoblotting using normal human skin, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results: Immunomapping demonstrated the presence of all the antigens known to be targeted in autoimmune bullous skin diseases, in both normal human skin and HAM, except for the absence of BP230, and low threshold levels of Dsg1, Dsg3 and Dsc3 in HAM. HAM indirect immunofluorescence demonstrated anti-basement membrane zone antibodies in 48.7% of the pemphigoid patients, and anti-intercellular space antibodies in 72.0% of the pemphigus patients. HAM immunoblotting did not demonstrate anti-BP230 antibodies, but detected anti-BP180 antibodies in 53.6% of the pemphigoid patients. It did not demonstrate anti-Dsg1 and/or anti-Dsg3 antibodies in any of the pemphigus patients. These results were inferior to those of ELISA and monkey esophagus indirect immunofluorescence.

Conclusions: Compared to other studied methods, HAM does not offer advantages in detecting autoantibodies in bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus vulgaris. 

September 2011
E. Avitan-Hersh, G. Berger and R. Bergman
June 2008
L. Zoller, M. Ramon and R. Bergman

Background: Atopic dermatitis or atopic eczema is an itchy inflammatory skin condition with a predilection of the skin flexures. Most cases start in children although some have been reported in adults. Patients with moderate to severe disease refractory to topical corticosteroid or calcineurin inhibitors may require second-line treatment such as phototherapy or systemic immunosuppressants. Methotrexate therapy has been suggested to be a useful immunosuppressant in adult atopic dermatitis.

Objectives: To further determine the efficacy of low dose methotrexate therapy in adults with new-onset atopic dermatitis or with idiopathic eczema.

Methods: All adult patients with new-onset atopic dermatitis or idiopathic eczema treated by methotrexate in our clinics from 2004 to 2006 were included in the study. All had failed prolonged therapy with oral antihistamines and local corticosteroid creams. Methotrexate, 10–20 mg, was given orally once a week along with folic acid supplements 5 days a week. Additional therapies included predominantly emollients. During the entire treatment period the investigators made global assessments of the clinical response.

Results: Nine patients diagnosed with late-onset atopic dermatitis (n=6) or idiopathic eczema (n=3) were treated with methotrexate. All patients responded to the drug. The initial response was noted after 3–7 weeks. Six patients achieved complete remission after 3 months of methotrexate therapy and three patients had significant improvement. One patient's the condition worsened after achieving a complete response while on methotrexate and it was withdrawn completely. No serious adverse events were noted during treatment.

Conclusions: Low dose methotrexate is an effective therapeutic alternative for late-onset atopic dermatitis or idiopathic eczema in patients unresponsive to local and other systemic therapies.
 

February 2004
I. Solt, L. Lowenstein, A. Amit, R. Bergman and H. Kerner
Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or medical advice on any matter.
The IMA is not responsible for and expressly disclaims liability for damages of any kind arising from the use of or reliance on information contained within the site.
© All rights to information on this site are reserved and are the property of the Israeli Medical Association. Privacy policy

2 Twin Towers, 35 Jabotinsky, POB 4292, Ramat Gan 5251108 Israel